Phish
Flag this Post?
Displaying all 21 posts
schtick?
They've definitely got to do something before they fade into complete oblivion. It seems like something they really should be focusing on, as opposed to putting everything they've got into blocking and complaining about the current administration. Move to the center, or go further to the right, alienating more of the American public. GOP'ers, what say you?
They've definitely got to do something before they fade into complete oblivion. It seems like something they really should be focusing on, as opposed to putting everything they've got into blocking and complaining about the current administration. Move to the center, or go further to the right, alienating more of the American public. GOP'ers, what say you?
I think they r still trying to wrap their arms around the whole" the us isn't all white anymore". That was the bread and butter.
Obama was 2 points higher in the popular vote than Romney. I don't think they're that close to fading into complete oblivion. You liberals are quite funny though.
I think that both parties have to come together and stop the wars (doing it the right way), stop the spending and increase personal responsibility. Unfortunately, that will never happen as both sides would have objections to these things.
I think that both parties have to come together and stop the wars (doing it the right way), stop the spending and increase personal responsibility. Unfortunately, that will never happen as both sides would have objections to these things.
"you liberals" = "I'm a red state fucking reatard....seriously, I'm dumber than the average person and like the same things other dumb people like"
Quote:
Originally Posted by HinkHall Obama was 2 points higher in the popular vote than Romney. I don't think they're that close to fading into complete oblivion. You liberals are quite funny though.
I think that both parties have to come together and stop the wars (doing it the right way), stop the spending and increase personal responsibility. Unfortunately, that will never happen as both sides would have objections to these things. |
You sound pretty smart. So you're saying you don't think that your party is in dire need of an identity overhaul? If too many in the GOP keep that mindset and 'stay the course' you people are in for an even ruder awakening than you were Tuesday night.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sensesbleed GOP'ers, what say you? |
i dont think there are any on this board other than those few trolls
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eclectik1 "you liberals" = "I'm a red state fucking reatard....seriously, I'm dumber than the average person and like the same things other dumb people like" |
Quote:
Originally Posted by sensesbleed Quote:
You sound pretty smart. So you're saying you don't think that your party is in dire need of an identity overhaul? If too many in the GOP keep that mindset and 'stay the course' you people are in for an even ruder awakening than you were Tuesday night. |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaxons_Need Quote:
i dont think there are any on this board other than those few trolls |
Sounds about right, seeing that the only real answer to my question was given above from a PT'er claiming not to me a republican.
you mean pro choice candidate, right?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eclectik1 "you liberals" = "I'm a red state fucking reatard....seriously, I'm dumber than the average person and like the same things other dumb people like" |
ignoramus talking point/phrase meant to immediately dismiss anything said by a progressive person as inferior somehow. Bunch of bullies who just don't get it. With today's social media they can no longer run on lies and fear. People snub it out in seconds. Well all except the brainwashed idiots who listen to the AM radio haters alliance.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sensesbleed Quote:
Sounds about right, seeing that the only real answer to my question was given above from a PT'er claiming not to me a republican. |
Quote:
Originally Posted by indymfan you mean pro choice candidate, right? |
Quote:
Originally Posted by HinkHall Obama was 2 points higher in the popular vote than Romney. I don't think they're that close to fading into complete oblivion. You liberals are quite funny though.
I think that both parties have to come together and stop the wars (doing it the right way), stop the spending and increase personal responsibility. Unfortunately, that will never happen as both sides would have objections to these things. |
I agree with the second part, however, the point differential would've been much much greater if Barry was a whit guy. He lost the white vote by nearly 2:1
Quote:
Originally Posted by HinkHall Quote:
|
Well, I didn't discredit your opinion, I was replying to Jaxons_Need who was replying to me asking what GOP'ers had to say. Your opinion is welcome, sorry if you got confused when reading.
Quote:
Originally Posted by GOUGEaway Quote:
I agree with the second part, however, the point differential would've been much much greater if Barry was a whit guy. He lost the white vote by nearly 2:1 |
Quote:
Originally Posted by HinkHall Quote:
|
I'm going with closer to 60/40 (the 40 being a race issue).
Funny watching them wrestle with this on Fox News yesterday.
Anytime someone pointed out they're gonna need to change to adapt to demographics, they all freak out. They are just so absolutely sure that their party has never been wrong about anything, and that if it wasn't for these other factors (media, Sandy, etc) they would win in a landslide.
Gotta figure though that behind closed doors, any serious thinkers in the GOP are discussing this right now.
Anytime someone pointed out they're gonna need to change to adapt to demographics, they all freak out. They are just so absolutely sure that their party has never been wrong about anything, and that if it wasn't for these other factors (media, Sandy, etc) they would win in a landslide.
Gotta figure though that behind closed doors, any serious thinkers in the GOP are discussing this right now.
Quote:
Originally Posted by HinkHall Quote:
|
Naive. I can tell you are pretty young by this post.
By every measure, Obama has governed as a center-moderate, not the far left ideologue he has been painted to be. On foreign policy he has actually been center-right, and operated many of the same policies that George W Bush did. On Tax policy he allowed the conservative Bush tax cuts to continue. On Health care reform, he abandoned the liberal idea of a single-payer system, and bought into a conservative idealism of Dole and Romney with a plan that was nothing but a HUGE BOON to the Free Enterprise, in the form of an individual mandate to buy private insurance. He has appointed corporate, free enterprise people to government like in the case of the FDA.
By every measure, Obama has not been very liberal at all. True liberals, like myself, would very much like to see him move to a more left-leaning platform in tax policy as well foreign policy, something he will probably not be able to do, because he will need to govern from the center to fix the deficit, as well as the entitlement programs.
But to go even further, with your line of thinking, the electorate is entirely 100% informed and isn't treating the election as a popularity contest. I simply disagree. Most people vote their hardcore, rigid belief system which is instituted in childhood, and these belief systems are cemented in our neighborhoods, the people we associate, the color of the people that we see most frequently. This is the reason for over 200 years we have had white men dominate our political process. For centuries, the electorate was comprised of mostly white men, and they elected white men. That demographic is changing. More women are voting, and as a result more women are getting into office. More minorities are voting, and more minorities are getting into office. Black people overwhelmingly voted in favor of Barrack Obama, and they certainly didn't all lean that way because of policy.
The only way to align these realities with your belief set is to believe that white people, and white people alone are voting entirely on the premise of policy, and every other race is choosing primarily on the basis of skin color. While I would concede that many more white people vote on the basis of policy than any other minority group does, you need only look to sources like Fox News who are pushing the white voting block, who remains afraid of minority groups and the threat they pose to the American way of life that they know and love, to believe that they need to vote against Barrack Obama to save America from a changing demographic.
Nope its a nuerological fact that cons respond to fear and have larger fear regions in their brain. You can't fight biology.
Quote:
Originally Posted by HinkHall I'm not a Republican. |
no - I don't think they are.
Look at Boehner's comments election night - made it very clear that they still don't see any reason to even attempt to compromise on...anything.
Rush Limbaugh says that "a true conservative candidate" still has not been properly run (for President).
The extreme conservative right really feels that they lost because Romney wasn't conservative enough, they simply don't get it. Romney pretending to be a right-wing nutjob to win the Republican primaries only gave Obama/Democrats fodder for the general election. They alienated minorities and women consistently throughout the campaign and were telling themselves that there was a 'lack of enthusiasm' that would keep these voters at home (and tried to suppress minority voting as much as possible).
They convinced themselves that winning over Independent voters was the key to the election - and in this they were WRONG (Romney DID carry independent voters 55-45 nationally)...they were wrong because many voters who traditionally aligned as Independents ended up being pushed fully to the left/Democratic party (as indicated by significantly higher voter turnout for self-defined Democrats...it either means there are more Democrats in America now OR the Republican base was not motivated to turn out - in either case, that is not a good sign for "conservative principles" or the Republican platform achieving greater popularity).
Look at Boehner's comments election night - made it very clear that they still don't see any reason to even attempt to compromise on...anything.
Rush Limbaugh says that "a true conservative candidate" still has not been properly run (for President).
The extreme conservative right really feels that they lost because Romney wasn't conservative enough, they simply don't get it. Romney pretending to be a right-wing nutjob to win the Republican primaries only gave Obama/Democrats fodder for the general election. They alienated minorities and women consistently throughout the campaign and were telling themselves that there was a 'lack of enthusiasm' that would keep these voters at home (and tried to suppress minority voting as much as possible).
They convinced themselves that winning over Independent voters was the key to the election - and in this they were WRONG (Romney DID carry independent voters 55-45 nationally)...they were wrong because many voters who traditionally aligned as Independents ended up being pushed fully to the left/Democratic party (as indicated by significantly higher voter turnout for self-defined Democrats...it either means there are more Democrats in America now OR the Republican base was not motivated to turn out - in either case, that is not a good sign for "conservative principles" or the Republican platform achieving greater popularity).
This topic has been archived.
Support
|
Feedback
|
Terms of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Advertise
© 1999-2013 Phantasy Tour, LLC. All rights reserved.
© 1999-2013 Phantasy Tour, LLC. All rights reserved.
Lovingly rendered by Basis
just for you in 0.347809509 seconds.
Welcome, please login.